Skip to main content

Narratives of Nothing

It is often remarked that you can have a sociology of anything. It is not so often said that you can have a sociology of nothing, but this is exactly what Susie Scott of Sussex University is trying to develop. We are familiar with ideas about non-places since the work of Marc AugĂ© and Rob Shields, and George Ritzer has elaborated ideas of non-things and non-people in his book on The Globalization of Nothing, but Susie aims at a far more general approach to nothing at all.
 As part of her project on the Sociology of Nothing, extending her interactionist work on everyday life, she is collecting personal stories of non-doing, non-being, and non-having, exploring ideas and feelings about those things that are lost, missing, or have never happened. Details on the project can be found at https://nothingnarratives.wordpress.com/about  

 Stories submitted to the website on Narratives of Nothing include:
  •  a mother wanting space to ‘do nothing’ as a way of being herself;
  •  a daughter writing about the death of her father, his thoughts about becoming nothing, and her own thoughts about having lost him;
  •  a woman who had an embarrassing encounter with a stranger but said nothing to explain her embarrassment;
 Susie wants to hear more stories from anyone, rather than no one. Stories can be added publicly on the project website or privately to her at the dedicated email address on the site.

Originally Posted May 9 2017.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This post has now moved. Please now check at  https://www.johnscottcbe.com/blog/ All my existing posts have been archived at the new site, which is now regularly updated as part of my expanded sociology website. Please consult the site for information on social theory, the history of sociology, social structure (especially elites, power, class, and economic sociology), and research methods (especially social network analysis). Thanks John Scott

Integration and Social Structure

In my previous post I set out a view of the relationship between the interaction order and social structure. I want now to discuss the forms of integration or malintegration that exist at each level. These issues were famously discussed by David Lockwood in an article of 1964 through his distinction between ‘social integration’ and ‘system integration’ (in  Explorations in Social Change , edited by Zollschan and Hirsch). My claim is that social integration should be seen as relating to the interaction order and system integration as relating to the macro-level social structure. A state of social integration exists when interacting individuals and groups establish shared understandings that permit a coordination of their actions. They produce a negotiated order that underpins their joint action. Where there are failures in mutual understanding and a resulting lack of coordination, there is social disorder, rather than social order, and the potential for social disintegration. This...